[LV2] Mapping of OSC to LV2 Atoms
ssjackson71 at gmail.com
Thu Oct 15 12:39:45 PDT 2015
On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 12:29 PM, David Robillard <d at drobilla.net> wrote:
> On Fri, 2015-06-19 at 22:33 +0200, Hanspeter Portner wrote:
> > * The four exotic OSC types 'T'rue, 'F'alse, 'N'il, 'I'nfinitum have
> > no associated data in OSC. Should they be mapped to atoms and
> > packed into the arguments tuple or only show up in the message
> > format string like in OSC?
> I don't know about nil and infinitum, but it seems true and false
> clearly map to Bool. There is no type string for atom objects, so a
> true bidirectional mapping shouldn't be missing bits and rely on some
> external funny thing (a format string) to fill in the gaps, IMO.
The OSC spec works this way, with NO bits at all in the data section to
correspond to these types. So I maintain my previous argument. As Hanspeter
said, it would require a change in any existing logic that handles OSC
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Devel