[Devel] uri-map: what is the `map` parameter for?
gabrbedd at gmail.com
Mon Jul 18 16:52:16 PDT 2011
On 07/18/2011 05:21 PM, David Robillard wrote:
>> Deprecating the `map` parameter should be sufficient... even if you
>> have to say "but for use with the events extension, you must pass the
>> events extension URI as the `map` parameter" or some such thing.
> That is exactly what the event extension says, and is exactly the
OK, I see it now. It's in the intro to the header. I was looking just
at the doc for LV2_Event::type.
> Put simply:
> We need, in general, a method to map/unmap a URI to/from an integer. We
> do *not* have this. We have a method to map a URI to/from a *pair* of
> integers, i.e. we have several URI-integer namespaces.
> The consequence of this is a big ugly mess of having to keep track of,
> and convert between, contexts, and makes the whole thing much more
> confusing than it should be.
Agreed. Thanks for clarifying what the mess is, too. (Really).
> While we're on the topic, using string interning instead is also an
> option if we're going to change how we deal with URIs quickly. That
> makes unmapping trivial... but pointers are not a fixed size across
My preference is a system like X11 Atoms.
More information about the Devel