[Devel] hardRtCapable vs hardRTCapable

[Stefano D'Angelo]

2011/12/23 David Robillard <d at drobilla.net>:
> On Wed, 2011-12-21 at 05:54 +0200, Stefano D'Angelo wrote:
>> 2011/12/21 David Robillard <d at drobilla.net>:
>> > On Mon, 2011-12-19 at 10:13 +0200, Stefano D'Angelo wrote:
>> >> Small but annoying issue: some plugins use lv2:hardRtCapable (swh,
>> >> calf, invada, naspro), others lv2:hardRTCapable (lv2core, mdala)... I
>> >> don't know how this happened, maybe an earlier lv2 spec had lowcase
>> >> "t"?
>> >
>> > The spec has always said lv2:hardRTCapable as far as I can tell...
>> >
>> > I don't know how comfortable I am with the idea of changing the spec to
>> > match plugins...
>>
>> I don't know as well, of course I have no problem changing it in
>> naspro bridges or generate both for some time, as well as supporting
>> both in my hosts. As long as one decision is taken I'm happy with it.
>>
>> However I just discovered another: swh and mdala plugins use a
>> lv2:pluginProperty predicate that is not in the spec...
>
> Which one?

All swh and mdala have something like:

lv2:pluginProperty lv2:hardRTCapable ;

and lv2:pluginProperty is not defined by the core spec...

Stefano

P.S.: sorry for the delay in answering, but my hometown is third world
w.r.t. internet connections.