[Devel] hardRtCapable vs hardRTCapable
d at drobilla.net
Fri Dec 23 09:39:58 PST 2011
On Wed, 2011-12-21 at 05:54 +0200, Stefano D'Angelo wrote:
> 2011/12/21 David Robillard <d at drobilla.net>:
> > On Mon, 2011-12-19 at 10:13 +0200, Stefano D'Angelo wrote:
> >> Small but annoying issue: some plugins use lv2:hardRtCapable (swh,
> >> calf, invada, naspro), others lv2:hardRTCapable (lv2core, mdala)... I
> >> don't know how this happened, maybe an earlier lv2 spec had lowcase
> >> "t"?
> > The spec has always said lv2:hardRTCapable as far as I can tell...
> > I don't know how comfortable I am with the idea of changing the spec to
> > match plugins...
> I don't know as well, of course I have no problem changing it in
> naspro bridges or generate both for some time, as well as supporting
> both in my hosts. As long as one decision is taken I'm happy with it.
> However I just discovered another: swh and mdala plugins use a
> lv2:pluginProperty predicate that is not in the spec...
I really need to write a validator for this stuff one of these days...
More information about the Devel