<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">Am 29.01.2014 16:49, schrieb David
Robillard:<br>
</div>
<blockquote cite="mid:1391010549.25739.28.camel@verne.drobilla.net"
type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Well... deliberately using the deprecated extension <b class="moz-txt-star"><span class="moz-txt-tag">*</span>after<span class="moz-txt-tag">*</span></b> trying the
new one was a bad decision. Sorry.
</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
Maybe it helps if you write the <span class="warning">DEPRECATED
note as well in the header itself. <br>
But instead the release note reads as followed:<br>
</span><br>
<dt><a href="http://lv2plug.in/spec/lv2-1.4.0.tar.bz2">Version 1.10</a>
(2013-01-13)</dt>
<dd>
<ul>
<li>Fix incorrect return type in lv2_event_get().</li>
</ul>
</dd>
<blockquote cite="mid:1391010549.25739.28.camel@verne.drobilla.net"
type="cite">
<pre wrap="">
If you're just using MIDI there is not much difference between either,
the sizes and structs used are just a bit different. If you had a
problem, you should have asked, and it would have been
resolved/clarified. Lack of communication like this is what makes it
necessary to put pressure on projects via means like warnings and
removing support. I'm not omniscient, I can only use the information
and tools that are available to move this project forward.
</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
To help me understand your intentions, would you explain me please,
what is the bad with the event extension. <br>
<br>
greets<br>
hermann<br>
<br>
</body>
</html>