[LV2] worker thread question
hermann meyer
brummer- at web.de
Fri Dec 28 23:55:55 PST 2012
Am 29.12.2012 05:22, schrieb hermann meyer:
> Am 28.12.2012 23:59, schrieb David Robillard:
>> More threads, more problems. Do non-rt things in a worker, and I/O and
>> processing in run(). More threads complicated things massively for no
>> win. The idea of a "watch thread" doesn't really make any sense.
> Thanks for taking you time
>
> bye
> hermann
So I have add my own watch thread, for the case you like to review the
source, here it is:
http://sourceforge.net/p/guitarix/git/ci/11f2c1985e4c553ccd66b5fce2acd0a760923b49/tree/trunk/src/LV2/gxamp.lv2/gxamp.cpp
I have just 2 float values to check here, so it wouldn't spare much
processing, but as I said, that will properly change in the next time.
regards
hermann
More information about the Devel
mailing list