[LV2] worker thread question

hermann meyer brummer- at web.de
Fri Dec 28 23:55:55 PST 2012


Am 29.12.2012 05:22, schrieb hermann meyer:
> Am 28.12.2012 23:59, schrieb David Robillard:
>> More threads, more problems.  Do non-rt things in a worker, and I/O and
>> processing in run().  More threads complicated things massively for no
>> win.  The idea of a "watch thread" doesn't really make any sense.
> Thanks for taking you time
>
> bye
> hermann

So I have add my own watch thread, for the case you like to review the 
source, here it is:

http://sourceforge.net/p/guitarix/git/ci/11f2c1985e4c553ccd66b5fce2acd0a760923b49/tree/trunk/src/LV2/gxamp.lv2/gxamp.cpp

I have just 2 float values to check here, so it wouldn't spare much 
processing, but as I said, that will properly change in the next time.


regards
hermann



More information about the Devel mailing list