[LV2] lv2.pc vs lv2core.pc

[David Robillard]

On Tue, 2012-08-07 at 04:19 -0400, Jeremy Salwen wrote:
> There seem to be two pkg-config files included in LV2 1.0.  They both
> are functionally equivalent, and while the human-readable descriptions
> in each are unique, they both basically mean the same thing.
> 
> What's the deal?  Is this a mistake?  What's the difference between
> them? Which one should be used?

'lv2core' is for backwards compatibility with the old lv2core package.
It only guarantees the core (i.e. lv2.h and lv2core.ttl), is present

Modern code should use 'lv2'

-dr

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.lv2plug.in/pipermail/devel-lv2plug.in/attachments/20120808/8d950d59/attachment-0002.pgp>